I am seriously dissapointed in the Signal's lack of professional journalism this week. Upon reading the Signal I noticed that that there was an extensive article discussing how Sen. Jon Corzine is the better candidate for NJ Governor. Missing from The Signal was any information on Reublican candidate Doug Forrester. The only information on Doug Forrester was that he does not care about education, and would make a horrible governor. I ask where is the balance in your paper? Why is it that the Signal constantly publishes liberaly slanted articles without any conservative viewpoint? The news is supposed to be presented to the people in an unbaised manner, and the signal has failed to do that. I hope that in the future, the Signal will learn some ethical practices and offer both sides of a story so the reader can make their own decisions.
